ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

Anti romance is the new romance

From living and dying together in Qayamat Se Qayamat Tak to the obsessive love in Kabir Singh or the bloodbath passion of O'Romeo, romantic movies in Bollywood are no longer what they used to be.

Poster of O Romeo / Courtesy: Bollywood Insider

Nothing evokes warm, fuzzy romance quite like classic Hindi cinema. Dial back to the monumental love of Mughal-e-Azam, the multi-generational ache of Kabhi Kabhie, or the postcard-perfect Europe of Dilwale Dulhania Le Jayenge. Or take Lamhe, a film that spoke of love that aged, waited, and carried the weight of years.

Who can forget Sadma? A haunting story of love at its unconditional best, offering no reward, only heartbreak that lingers long after the final frame. For decades, Hindi cinema was the ultimate destination for love—pure, hopeful, and aspirational. A sigh here, a teardrop there, and hearts brimmed with promise.

For decades, the Bollywood lover's journey was a safe haven. The hero could serenade and wait, and if love was unrequited, he could sacrifice it for the heroine's happiness. He might suffer but was usually rewarded in the end.

ALSO READ: The eternal Madhubala

Take Sunil (Shah Rukh Khan) in Kabhi Haan Kabhi Naa: he loses the girl of his dreams, Anna (Suchitra Krishnamoorthy), to Chris (Deepak Tijori), yet the film leaves him walking into the moonlight, carrying hope and the promise of new love. Even when films like Baazigar, Anjaam, and Darr introduced darker, more morally complex stories, love itself—though tested—always proved victorious.

Those were the days when love was destiny, not danger. The heroine was protected. That grammar, that blueprint, is now being rewritten. Anti-romance doesn't reject love; it rejects what love traditionally stood for in Bollywood.

There are no grand vows but volatile choices. These films do not present love as redemption but rather expose its raw vulnerability and flaws. Today, romance hasn't vanished; it has splintered. What's rising isn't just the anti-hero but anti-romance: love that claims ownership and bruises more than it builds or heals.

Romance rewired

The old romantic archetype was Aditya from Jab We Met: emotionally available, kind, and patient. Even in pain, he was gentle; love healed him. Contrast this with Kabir Singh in Kabir Singh, where love amplifies the hero's worst instincts.

For him, the line between devotion and obsession is nonexistent. Desire transforms into entitlement. Kabir is rebellious and aggressive enough to weaponize romance. This is the new romantic lead: volatile, self-destructive, and deeply flawed. He doesn't believe in solutions, only impulsive action.

Then comes Animal, where love is neither gentle nor reassuring. Romance is loud, aggressive, and unsettling. It is possessive, violent, and shaped by power dynamics rather than mutual trust.

The relationship isn't something audiences are meant to aspire to—it is cautionary. Sandeep Reddy Vanga's film again illustrates obsession being mistaken for devotion, a hallmark of anti-romance narratives.

That sense of destruction continues in Vishal Bhardwaj's O'Romeo. Afsha (Triptii Dimri) tells Ustara (Shahid Kapoor) that love is a curse that will destroy them both; she calls herself a dynamite capable of blowing him up to smithereens.

Their connection is not rooted in desire for one another but in a shared vendetta against a gangster. Love does not flourish in safe spaces here; the relationship is defined by violence, survival, and vengeance.

Ustara is not the charming, gallant hero of earlier eras—he is rough, dangerous, and unpredictable. Afsha, likewise, is not waiting to be swept off her feet; she is negotiating toward her ultimate goal: the destruction of a common enemy.

Not disrespect

Anti-romance is not only about warped or violent depictions of love; it also challenges what is considered acceptable under its guise. Thappad illustrates this perfectly. There is no dramatic, drawn-out collapse of a marriage—just one slap. Yet the ripple effect is immense, as the woman chooses to assert that love cannot justify disrespect. The romance does not implode in chaos; it quietly loses its meaning, forcing reflection rather than melodrama.

October takes the opposite route. There are no declarations of love, no confrontations, and no climactic victories. At the story's core is care—one-sided, patient, and quiet. It is love without expectation or reward. The restraint is palpable, and the film feels deeply personal, a reminder that not all love stories are meant to be fulfilled or celebrated with fireworks.

Rise of anti-romance

The anti-romance is not just surviving—it is thriving. The mega-success of Kabir Singh and Animal is proof. Audiences are changing: they want more than grand gestures and tidy happy endings.

There is a growing acceptance that love can be complicated, even destructive. Anti-romance does not indicate that Bollywood has stopped believing in love; rather, it shows that Hindi cinema is finally willing to portray it unfiltered. Songs may still play, but they no longer guarantee happiness. Passion may burn brighter, but it leaves scars.

By replacing fantasy with friction, these films reflect a more honest emotional landscape, where love does not always save you. Perhaps, in today's world, that feels more real than any fairytale ever could.

Discover more at New India Abroad.

Comments

Related