ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

Ramit Sethi urges Hilton boycott over ICE dispute

The hotel chain had cut ties with a Minnesota property amid tensions on accommodation of ICE agents.

Indian-American entrepreneur Ramit Sethi / Courtesy: X/@ramit

Indian-American entrepreneur Ramit Sethi has called for a boycott of Hilton after the hotel chain ended its association with a Minnesota property.

The property owned by a group of Indian-origin hoteliers had declined to accommodate U.S. immigration enforcement agents, a move that has intensified debate around federal operations in the state.

Sethi raised objections on X after the company removed the Hampton Inn near Minneapolis from its systems. He said the hotel’s refusal to host agents from U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) was justified and criticized Hilton for cutting ties.

Also Read: Rep. Khanna slams "systemic neglect" at California's largest detention center



In a series of X posts, he used strong language to describe the agency, suggested that public sentiment was hostile toward it, and said he supported businesses that opposed its presence.

Sethi also said he had contacted Hilton’s leadership to explain his boycott and, dissatisfied with the response, decided to continue the boycott, adding that others had told him they were cancelling reservations.

The dispute centers on a Hampton Inn by Hilton in Lakeville. The hotel, owned by Everpeak Hospitality and managed by Indian-American operators including Parmjit Singh, Amanpreet Hundal, Karandeep Nagra, and Mohinderjeet Kaur, reportedly cancelled bookings made by ICE agents using government identification. 

Material cited by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) included an email from the hotel stating that immigration agents were not being allowed to stay at the property.

Hilton issued a statement saying the independent operator had initially addressed the issue and apologized, in line with the company’s non-discrimination policies. However, after a video emerged showing a hotel employee indicating that the refusal remained in place, Hilton said the property was not meeting brand standards.



The company said it was taking immediate steps to remove the hotel from its systems, reiterating that its hotels are intended to be welcoming to all guests and that franchisees would be reminded of brand requirements.

Comments

Related